Abia Court Postpones Sen. Orji’s N1.5 Billion Defamation Suit Against Apugo

An Abia State High Court sitting in Umuahia has adjourned a N1.5 billion defamation suit filed by former Governor Theodore Orji against a chieftain of the All Progressives Congress, Prince Benjamin Apugo, until February 16. The suit, which has been ongoing since 2020, was filed due to alleged false and malicious remarks made by Apugo that were deemed injurious to the personality of Sen. Orji.

During the hearing, the trial judge, Justice A. O. Chijioke, observed a delay in the process and ordered that the defendant must appear in court on the next adjourned date.

He emphasized that the trial would begin on the next adjourned date, with or without the presence of the defendant.

The plaintiff’s lawyer, Chief Henry Balogu, explained to Vanguard that the suit was filed because the defendant made libelous and false remarks on a live radio program, accusing his client of looting the Abia treasury while holding the positions of Chief of Staff and Governor.

As the case continues, it is important to consider the potential implications of the court’s decision on both parties and the wider political landscape in Abia State.

The outcome of this defamation suit could set a precedent for future cases involving public figures and the media.

It is also crucial to keep in mind the need for responsible journalism and the importance of verifying the veracity of information before publishing it.

The case highlights the necessity for all parties involved in the political process to maintain a high level of integrity and accountability.

The Abia High Court’s adjournment of Sen. Orji’s defamation suit against Apugo has sparked further interest in the case, and the outcome on February 16 will undoubtedly be closely watched by many.

Share this news

Subscribe to the Advocate News letter and receive news updates daily in your inbox.

Check Also

Fuel Subsidy Removal: Tinubu’s Bold Move to Save Nigeria from Bankruptcy

President Bola Tinubu has defended his administration’s decision to remove the fuel subsidy, stating that …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *