The African Democratic Congress has accused Nafiu Bala Gombe's legal team of judge-shopping. They claim the lawyers are trying to manipulate court proceedings against the party's David Mark-led leadership.
Party spokesman Bolaji Abdullahi issued a statement on Friday calling the move "curious and laughable." He argued that any genuine plaintiff wouldn't run from a quick hearing of their own case.
A Federal High Court in Abuja adjourned the matter indefinitely on Friday. Justice Emeka Nwite postponed proceedings after Gombe informed the court he'd requested case reassignment from the Chief Judge.
Gombe, an ADC chieftain, filed the suit challenging party leadership under former Senate President Mark. The case, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025, has triggered fresh turmoil within ADC ranks.
According to the ADC, Gombe's reassignment request exposes a troubling pattern. Party officials suspect ruling party operatives are orchestrating the maneuver to secure a sympathetic judge.
In its statement, ADC said the letter to the Chief Judge confirmed "a sinister plot." Political actors allegedly want to influence judicial outcomes, the party alleged.
"This isn't about justice anymore," the ADC responded bluntly. "It's about desperate political operatives realizing their case has no merit."
ADC further slammed Gombe for treating courts like a marketplace. "You cannot file a case then dictate which judge hears it," party officials declared.
They noted no litigant has the right to pick judges in their own matters. Yet Gombe appears determined to shop for a favorable bench.
ADC questioned why Gombe seeks indefinite delays when appellate courts directed expedited hearings. His behavior contradicts claims of genuinely seeking justice, party officials contended.
"Instead of proceeding swiftly, Bala and his handlers stall constantly," the statement read. They're hunting for judges willing to do their bidding, ADC alleged.
Party leadership warned against political interference in judicial matters. Such manipulation threatens public confidence in courts, they cautioned.
Mark's emergence as NWC chairman has created significant ADC divisions. The leadership dispute shows no signs of resolution soon.
Court proceedings remain stalled indefinitely pending the Chief Judge's decision. The outcome will determine whether the case proceeds or faces further complications.
Political observers view the clash as a critical test of judicial independence. How courts respond may shape opposition party dynamics going forward.
