APC Clarifies Differences Between Ganduje’s and Oshiomhole’s Suspension

The All Progressives Congress (APC) has come out to clarify the differences between the current situation of its National Chairman, Abdullahi Ganduje, and that of former National Chairman Adams Oshiomhole, who was removed from office in 2020.

He explained that the circumstances surrounding Ganduje’s suspension are distinct from those that led to the removal of Oshiomhole and members of the National Working Committee (NWC) two years into their tenure.

Morka pointed out that the key difference lies in the identities of the individuals involved in the actions against the two chairmen.

In Oshiomhole’s case, the people who sought his suspension were recognized members of the party, whereas, in Ganduje’s case, the individuals pushing for his suspension are not legitimate officials of the APC.

According to Morka, the man who purportedly announced Ganduje’s suspension was the same person who later denied participating in the action or authorizing any lawyer to go to court against the national chairman.

This discrepancy raises questions about the legitimacy of the suspension and the individuals involved.

Morka emphasized that the actions of these “imposters” could have serious legal and political consequences.

He urged those behind the suspension to stop their efforts and warned of repercussions when the situation is resolved.

The clarification from the APC highlights the complexities of internal party politics and the challenges faced by party leaders in maintaining order and unity.

As the situation surrounding Ganduje’s suspension unfolds, it will undoubtedly have implications for the future of the APC and its leadership.